Minden Gross LLP
Section Head


 

The Budget and Ontario’s Economy

– Marked for Death?
 

by David Louis, B. Com., J.D., C.A., Tax Partner
Minden Gross LLP, a member of MERITAS Law Firms Worldwide. 

 (*This release is based on an article published Tax Notes/Ontario Tax Reporter - April,  CCH Canadian Limited)

 ___________

It may be a bit of an overstatement to say that the Ontario economy is under siege.  But there’s no denying that the rise of the Canadian dollar, which has made resource-rich western provinces wealthy, has done the opposite in Ontario, causing major damage to its manufacturing infrastructure[1].  Office construction in downtown Toronto has been flat for years.    

One would think that the Ontario government would be pulling out a lot of stops to counter these effects.  There should be corporate tax decreases, incentives and changes to the Ontario legal environment, to promote manufacturing and attempt to maintain corporate head offices in Ontario.

Instead, not only was the March 23rd Ontario budget virtually bereft of tax incentives, but with continued deficits, I think that the message it sends is one of indifference toward the corporate sector. 

The only corporate tax reduction in the budget was a 5% provincial capital tax reduction starting in 2007.[2]  The budget papers state – and I quote – that this is one of the “key elements” for “maintaining a competitive tax and business environment . . . to encourage investment growth”[3]

Is this a joke?  While the former Liberal government proposed to eliminate federal capital tax completely this year, the actual reduction in capital tax is from .3% to .285% in 2007 and 2008[4].  This amounts to a $1,500 reduction per $10M of taxable capital.  The sum total of tax benefits from Budget 2006 for such a corporation would be $3,000 – actually less, since these taxes are deductible federally.

While the Quebec, B.C. and Manitoba budgets are receptive to the federal proposal to increase the dividend tax credit, the budget papers indicate that Ontario will “review” the federal legislation and respond when it becomes available[5].  This statement sure restores business confidence!

About the only glimmer of hope in the budget is a continuing initiative to eliminate the double audit jeopardy that Ontario corporations face as a result of the dual corporate tax regime.  The budget indicates that Ontario intends to enter into a tax collection agreement with the federal government whereby there would be one audit, performed by the CRA.  While this agreement is a number of years off, the governments have in the meantime been working on a “memorandum of agreement”, which, when finalized, would start the process whereby audits could be delegated to the CRA.[6]  But don’t hold your breath.  The memorandum awaits the review of the new federal government, after which human resources issues must be dealt with and CRA auditors must be trained in Ontario tax.  Even then, it is expected that the single-audit system will be phased-in.[7]  Meanwhile, the red tape continues.

Hard to Kill

The fact of the matter is that the Ontario tax system is replete with tax burdens and anomalies which the current government has done nothing to deal with.  Some of these include: a ceiling-less Employee Health Tax which exacts a burdensome toll charge on owner-manager bonuses; the small business “claw-back” - which imposes an effective marginal tax rate of about 41% for corporate income between $400,000 and about $1.13M; a 1.5% land transfer tax[8] - a significant disincentive to real estate transactions.  Even dying is expensive in Ontario, due to 1.5% probate fees[9] – the highest in the country.

Recent tax-related initiatives do little to instill a sense of confidence in our current government.  An example is the legislation allowing family members of Ontario dentists and physicians to be shareholders of medical and dental professional corporations.  Recall that they were enacted as a bargaining concession to physicians.  A review of the provisions reveals that they are of little benefit[10].  This means either that the legislation is inept, or duplicitously designed for this result - I am not sure which.  But neither alternative is particularly reassuring.

As for the non-tax legislative environment, once upon a time, Ontario was considered to be exemplary in having up-to-date corporate-commercial laws.  In recent years this seems to have become less of a priority.  For example, there have been relatively few recent changes to the Business Corporations Act, whereas Alberta and B.C. recently modernized their legislation (Alberta now has ULCs). 

On Deadly Ground

In my view, the budget does little to address the significant threats to Ontario’s economy.  As the McGuinty regime progresses, its indifference toward the corporate sector becomes more and more apparent.  In fact, rather than decreasing provincial corporate taxes as the previous government had planned to do, practically the first thing the Liberals did when they took office was to increase the general corporate tax rate - to 14%, one of the highest levels in Canada.

Personally, I am beginning to think that we were better off with the ‘90s NDP government.  Is it McGuinty or McEmpty?

 

[i] See, for example “Once-mighty Ontario Slides Further Behind”, Jason Clemens, Director of Fiscal Studies, and Director of Strategic Planning & Budgeting, The Fraser Institute, which appeared in the National Post, 09 March 2006.  The author states:

 

While part of the explanation for these economic troubles stem from external forces, one cannot underestimate the influence of public policy. Specifically, the marked deterioration in Ontario’s investment climate was caused in part by increases in personal and business taxes and counterproductive changes to labour laws. While part of the explanation for these economic troubles stem from external forces, one cannot underestimate the influence of public policy. Specifically, the marked deterioration in Ontario’s investment climate was caused in part by increases in personal and business taxes and counterproductive changes to labour laws.

 

[ii] Ontario proposes to extend the increase in the Ontario production services tax credit rate to 18% until March 31, 2007.  It will increase the Ontario interactive digital media tax credit rate to 30% (from 20%) for corporations currently qualifying for the credit, and extend the credit at the 20% rate to larger multimedia developers and fee-for-service work done in Ontario.

Ontario proposes to follow the federal government’s proposal (from November 2005) to extend the carryforward period for non-capital losses to 20 years (from 10 years), applicable to general non-capital losses, farm losses and restricted farm losses incurred in taxation years ending after 2005.

Also followed will be the November 2005 proposals in respect of expenses incurred in issuing shares and options, as well as the federal proposals in respect of Class 43.1 (certain cogeneration systems in the pulp and paper industry).

 

The budget pro­poses to increase the income threshold for Sales and Property Tax Credits; the new thresholds will be announced later this year.

 

[iii] Budget Papers, page 107.

 

[iv]  As it applies to non-financial institutions, the following is the capital tax elimination schedule:

 

 

Deduction ($M)

Rate (%)

Jan. 1, 2006

10

.3

Jan. 1, 2007

12.5

.285*

Jan. 1, 2008

15

.285*

Jan. 1, 2009

15

.225

Jan. 1, 2010

15

.15

Jan. 1, 2011

15

.075

Jan. 1, 2012

n/a

NIL

*Formerly .3%

 

[v] Granted, there were similar statements in the Alberta budget.

 

[vi] Per page 199 of the Budget Papers, legislation will be proposed that would permit an early integration of federal and Ontario tax audits, enabling the CRA “to audit Ontario’s corporate taxes for taxation years ending before the commencement of a corporate tax collection agreement.” 

 

[vii] Per a discussion with a government official, at the early stages, both the provincial and federal auditor may turn up at the same time; a single audit may be initially be limited to a relatively few number of corporations.

 

[viii] Ignoring threshold rates. 

Proposed land transfer tax amendments include specifying that if a document is:

·         registered during the deferral period, the deferred tax would become payable; or

·         registered after the deferred tax is cancelled, tax would be payable on the registration based on the earlier unregistered transfer of beneficial ownership.

 

Amendments to the interpretation of the term “affiliate” will be proposed.

 

[ix] Ignoring threshold rates.

 

[x]  See “Update #2: Non-Professionals as Shareholders of Ontario Professional Corporations”, by Michael Goldberg, Tax Notes No. 517, February 2006.

 

clear
© 2008 Minden Gross LLP  All rights reserved.